// SPDX-License-Identifier: CC0-1.0

//! Concrete Policies
//!

use core::{fmt, str};
#[cfg(feature = "std")]
use std::error;

use bitcoin::{absolute, Sequence};
#[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
use {
    crate::descriptor::TapTree,
    crate::miniscript::ScriptContext,
    crate::policy::compiler::CompilerError,
    crate::policy::compiler::OrdF64,
    crate::policy::{compiler, Concrete, Liftable, Semantic},
    crate::Descriptor,
    crate::Miniscript,
    crate::Tap,
    core::cmp::Reverse,
};

use super::ENTAILMENT_MAX_TERMINALS;
use crate::expression::{self, FromTree};
use crate::iter::TreeLike;
use crate::miniscript::types::extra_props::TimelockInfo;
use crate::prelude::*;
use crate::sync::Arc;
#[cfg(all(doc, not(feature = "compiler")))]
use crate::Descriptor;
use crate::{errstr, AbsLockTime, Error, ForEachKey, MiniscriptKey, Translator};

/// Maximum TapLeafs allowed in a compiled TapTree
#[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
const MAX_COMPILATION_LEAVES: usize = 1024;

/// Concrete policy which corresponds directly to a miniscript structure,
/// and whose disjunctions are annotated with satisfaction probabilities
/// to assist the compiler.
// Currently the vectors in And/Or are limited to two elements, this is a general miniscript thing
// not specific to rust-miniscript. Eventually we would like to extend these to be n-ary, but first
// we need to decide on a game plan for how to efficiently compile n-ary disjunctions
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord, Hash)]
pub enum Policy<Pk: MiniscriptKey> {
    /// Unsatisfiable.
    Unsatisfiable,
    /// Trivially satisfiable.
    Trivial,
    /// A public key which must sign to satisfy the descriptor.
    Key(Pk),
    /// An absolute locktime restriction.
    After(AbsLockTime),
    /// A relative locktime restriction.
    Older(Sequence),
    /// A SHA256 whose preimage must be provided to satisfy the descriptor.
    Sha256(Pk::Sha256),
    /// A SHA256d whose preimage must be provided to satisfy the descriptor.
    Hash256(Pk::Hash256),
    /// A RIPEMD160 whose preimage must be provided to satisfy the descriptor.
    Ripemd160(Pk::Ripemd160),
    /// A HASH160 whose preimage must be provided to satisfy the descriptor.
    Hash160(Pk::Hash160),
    /// A list of sub-policies, all of which must be satisfied.
    And(Vec<Arc<Policy<Pk>>>),
    /// A list of sub-policies, one of which must be satisfied, along with
    /// relative probabilities for each one.
    Or(Vec<(usize, Arc<Policy<Pk>>)>),
    /// A set of descriptors, satisfactions must be provided for `k` of them.
    Threshold(usize, Vec<Arc<Policy<Pk>>>),
}

impl<Pk> Policy<Pk>
where
    Pk: MiniscriptKey,
{
    /// Construct a `Policy::After` from `n`. Helper function equivalent to
    /// `Policy::After(absolute::LockTime::from_consensus(n))`.
    pub fn after(n: u32) -> Policy<Pk> {
        Policy::After(AbsLockTime::from(absolute::LockTime::from_consensus(n)))
    }

    /// Construct a `Policy::Older` from `n`. Helper function equivalent to
    /// `Policy::Older(Sequence::from_consensus(n))`.
    pub fn older(n: u32) -> Policy<Pk> { Policy::Older(Sequence::from_consensus(n)) }
}

/// Detailed error type for concrete policies.
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
pub enum PolicyError {
    /// `And` fragments only support two args.
    NonBinaryArgAnd,
    /// `Or` fragments only support two args.
    NonBinaryArgOr,
    /// `Thresh` fragment can only have `1<=k<=n`.
    IncorrectThresh,
    /// `older` or `after` fragment can only have `n = 0`.
    ZeroTime,
    /// `after` fragment can only have `n < 2^31`.
    TimeTooFar,
    /// Semantic Policy Error: `And` `Or` fragments must take args: `k > 1`.
    InsufficientArgsforAnd,
    /// Semantic policy error: `And` `Or` fragments must take args: `k > 1`.
    InsufficientArgsforOr,
    /// Entailment max terminals exceeded.
    EntailmentMaxTerminals,
    /// Cannot lift policies that have a combination of height and timelocks.
    HeightTimelockCombination,
    /// Duplicate Public Keys.
    DuplicatePubKeys,
}

/// Descriptor context for [`Policy`] compilation into a [`Descriptor`].
pub enum DescriptorCtx<Pk> {
    /// See docs for [`Descriptor::Bare`].
    Bare,
    /// See docs for [`Descriptor::Sh`].
    Sh,
    /// See docs for [`Descriptor::Wsh`].
    Wsh,
    /// See docs for [`Descriptor::Wsh`].
    ShWsh,
    /// [`Descriptor::Tr`] where the `Option<Pk>` corresponds to the internal key if no
    /// internal key can be inferred from the given policy.
    Tr(Option<Pk>),
}

impl fmt::Display for PolicyError {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result {
        match *self {
            PolicyError::NonBinaryArgAnd => {
                f.write_str("And policy fragment must take 2 arguments")
            }
            PolicyError::NonBinaryArgOr => f.write_str("Or policy fragment must take 2 arguments"),
            PolicyError::IncorrectThresh => {
                f.write_str("Threshold k must be greater than 0 and less than or equal to n 0<k<=n")
            }
            PolicyError::TimeTooFar => {
                f.write_str("Relative/Absolute time must be less than 2^31; n < 2^31")
            }
            PolicyError::ZeroTime => f.write_str("Time must be greater than 0; n > 0"),
            PolicyError::InsufficientArgsforAnd => {
                f.write_str("Semantic Policy 'And' fragment must have at least 2 args ")
            }
            PolicyError::InsufficientArgsforOr => {
                f.write_str("Semantic Policy 'Or' fragment must have at least 2 args ")
            }
            PolicyError::EntailmentMaxTerminals => {
                write!(f, "Policy entailment only supports {} terminals", ENTAILMENT_MAX_TERMINALS)
            }
            PolicyError::HeightTimelockCombination => {
                f.write_str("Cannot lift policies that have a heightlock and timelock combination")
            }
            PolicyError::DuplicatePubKeys => f.write_str("Policy contains duplicate keys"),
        }
    }
}

#[cfg(feature = "std")]
impl error::Error for PolicyError {
    fn cause(&self) -> Option<&dyn error::Error> {
        use self::PolicyError::*;

        match self {
            NonBinaryArgAnd
            | NonBinaryArgOr
            | IncorrectThresh
            | ZeroTime
            | TimeTooFar
            | InsufficientArgsforAnd
            | InsufficientArgsforOr
            | EntailmentMaxTerminals
            | HeightTimelockCombination
            | DuplicatePubKeys => None,
        }
    }
}

impl<Pk: MiniscriptKey> Policy<Pk> {
    /// Flattens the [`Policy`] tree structure into a vector of tuples `(leaf script, leaf probability)`
    /// with leaf probabilities corresponding to odds for each sub-branch in the policy.
    /// We calculate the probability of selecting the sub-branch at every level and calculate the
    /// leaf probabilities as the probability of traversing through required branches to reach the
    /// leaf node, i.e. multiplication of the respective probabilities.
    ///
    /// For example, the policy tree:       OR
    ///                                   /   \
    ///                                  2     1            odds
    ///                                /        \
    ///                               A         OR
    ///                                        /  \
    ///                                       3    1        odds
    ///                                     /       \
    ///                                    B         C
    ///
    /// gives the vector [(2/3, A), (1/3 * 3/4, B), (1/3 * 1/4, C)].
    ///
    /// ## Constraints
    ///
    /// Since this splitting might lead to exponential blow-up, we constrain the number of
    /// leaf-nodes to [`MAX_COMPILATION_LEAVES`].
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    fn to_tapleaf_prob_vec(&self, prob: f64) -> Vec<(f64, Policy<Pk>)> {
        match self {
            Policy::Or(ref subs) => {
                let total_odds: usize = subs.iter().map(|(ref k, _)| k).sum();
                subs.iter()
                    .flat_map(|(k, ref policy)| {
                        policy.to_tapleaf_prob_vec(prob * *k as f64 / total_odds as f64)
                    })
                    .collect::<Vec<_>>()
            }
            Policy::Threshold(k, ref subs) if *k == 1 => {
                let total_odds = subs.len();
                subs.iter()
                    .flat_map(|policy| policy.to_tapleaf_prob_vec(prob / total_odds as f64))
                    .collect::<Vec<_>>()
            }
            x => vec![(prob, x.clone())],
        }
    }

    /// Extracts the internal_key from this policy tree.
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    fn extract_key(self, unspendable_key: Option<Pk>) -> Result<(Pk, Policy<Pk>), Error> {
        let mut internal_key: Option<Pk> = None;
        {
            let mut prob = 0.;
            let semantic_policy = self.lift()?;
            let concrete_keys = self.keys();
            let key_prob_map: BTreeMap<_, _> = self
                .to_tapleaf_prob_vec(1.0)
                .into_iter()
                .filter(|(_, ref pol)| matches!(pol, Concrete::Key(..)))
                .map(|(prob, key)| (key, prob))
                .collect();

            for key in concrete_keys.into_iter() {
                if semantic_policy
                    .clone()
                    .satisfy_constraint(&Semantic::Key(key.clone()), true)
                    == Semantic::Trivial
                {
                    match key_prob_map.get(&Concrete::Key(key.clone())) {
                        Some(val) => {
                            if *val > prob {
                                prob = *val;
                                internal_key = Some(key.clone());
                            }
                        }
                        None => return Err(errstr("Key should have existed in the BTreeMap!")),
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        match (internal_key, unspendable_key) {
            (Some(ref key), _) => Ok((key.clone(), self.translate_unsatisfiable_pk(key))),
            (_, Some(key)) => Ok((key, self)),
            _ => Err(errstr("No viable internal key found.")),
        }
    }

    /// Compiles the [`Policy`] into a [`Descriptor::Tr`].
    ///
    /// ### TapTree compilation
    ///
    /// The policy tree constructed by root-level disjunctions over [`Policy::Or`] and
    /// [`Policy::Threshold`](1, ..) which is flattened into a vector (with respective
    /// probabilities derived from odds) of policies.
    ///
    /// For example, the policy `thresh(1,or(pk(A),pk(B)),and(or(pk(C),pk(D)),pk(E)))` gives the
    /// vector `[pk(A),pk(B),and(or(pk(C),pk(D)),pk(E)))]`. Each policy in the vector is compiled
    /// into the respective miniscripts. A Huffman Tree is created from this vector which optimizes
    /// over the probabilitity of satisfaction for the respective branch in the TapTree.
    ///
    /// Refer to [this link](https://gist.github.com/SarcasticNastik/9e70b2b43375aab3e78c51e09c288c89)
    /// or [doc/Tr compiler.pdf] in the root of the repository to understand why such compilation
    /// is also *cost-efficient*.
    // TODO: We might require other compile errors for Taproot.
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    pub fn compile_tr(&self, unspendable_key: Option<Pk>) -> Result<Descriptor<Pk>, Error> {
        self.is_valid()?; // Check for validity
        match self.is_safe_nonmalleable() {
            (false, _) => Err(Error::from(CompilerError::TopLevelNonSafe)),
            (_, false) => Err(Error::from(CompilerError::ImpossibleNonMalleableCompilation)),
            _ => {
                let (internal_key, policy) = self.clone().extract_key(unspendable_key)?;
                policy.check_num_tapleaves()?;
                let tree = Descriptor::new_tr(
                    internal_key,
                    match policy {
                        Policy::Trivial => None,
                        policy => {
                            let vec_policies: Vec<_> = policy.to_tapleaf_prob_vec(1.0);
                            let mut leaf_compilations: Vec<(OrdF64, Miniscript<Pk, Tap>)> = vec![];
                            for (prob, pol) in vec_policies {
                                // policy corresponding to the key (replaced by unsatisfiable) is skipped
                                if pol == Policy::Unsatisfiable {
                                    continue;
                                }
                                let compilation = compiler::best_compilation::<Pk, Tap>(&pol)?;
                                compilation.sanity_check()?;
                                leaf_compilations.push((OrdF64(prob), compilation));
                            }
                            let tap_tree = with_huffman_tree::<Pk>(leaf_compilations)?;
                            Some(tap_tree)
                        }
                    },
                )?;
                Ok(tree)
            }
        }
    }

    /// Compiles the [`Policy`] into a [`Descriptor::Tr`].
    ///
    /// ### TapTree compilation
    ///
    /// The policy tree constructed by root-level disjunctions over [`Policy::Or`] and
    /// [`Policy::Threshold`](k, ..n..) which is flattened into a vector (with respective
    /// probabilities derived from odds) of policies. For example, the policy
    /// `thresh(1,or(pk(A),pk(B)),and(or(pk(C),pk(D)),pk(E)))` gives the vector
    /// `[pk(A),pk(B),and(or(pk(C),pk(D)),pk(E)))]`.
    ///
    /// ### Policy enumeration
    ///
    /// Generates a root-level disjunctive tree over the given policy tree.
    ///
    /// Uses a fixed-point algorithm to enumerate the disjunctions until exhaustive root-level
    /// enumeration or limits exceed. For a given [`Policy`], we maintain an [ordered
    /// set](`BTreeSet`) of `(prob, policy)` (ordered by probability) to maintain the list of
    /// enumerated sub-policies whose disjunction is isomorphic to initial policy (*invariant*).
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    pub fn compile_tr_private_experimental(
        &self,
        unspendable_key: Option<Pk>,
    ) -> Result<Descriptor<Pk>, Error> {
        self.is_valid()?; // Check for validity
        match self.is_safe_nonmalleable() {
            (false, _) => Err(Error::from(CompilerError::TopLevelNonSafe)),
            (_, false) => Err(Error::from(CompilerError::ImpossibleNonMalleableCompilation)),
            _ => {
                let (internal_key, policy) = self.clone().extract_key(unspendable_key)?;
                let tree = Descriptor::new_tr(
                    internal_key,
                    match policy {
                        Policy::Trivial => None,
                        policy => {
                            let leaf_compilations: Vec<_> = policy
                                .enumerate_policy_tree(1.0)
                                .into_iter()
                                .filter(|x| x.1 != Arc::new(Policy::Unsatisfiable))
                                .map(|(prob, pol)| {
                                    (
                                        OrdF64(prob),
                                        compiler::best_compilation(pol.as_ref()).unwrap(),
                                    )
                                })
                                .collect();
                            let tap_tree = with_huffman_tree::<Pk>(leaf_compilations).unwrap();
                            Some(tap_tree)
                        }
                    },
                )?;
                Ok(tree)
            }
        }
    }

    /// Compiles the [`Policy`] into `desc_ctx` [`Descriptor`]
    ///
    /// In case of [`DescriptorCtx::Tr`], `internal_key` is used for the taproot compilation when
    /// no public key can be inferred from the given policy.
    ///
    /// # NOTE:
    ///
    /// It is **not recommended** to use policy as a stable identifier for a miniscript. You should
    /// use the policy compiler once, and then use the miniscript output as a stable identifier. See
    /// the compiler document in [`doc/compiler.md`] for more details.
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    pub fn compile_to_descriptor<Ctx: ScriptContext>(
        &self,
        desc_ctx: DescriptorCtx<Pk>,
    ) -> Result<Descriptor<Pk>, Error> {
        self.is_valid()?;
        match self.is_safe_nonmalleable() {
            (false, _) => Err(Error::from(CompilerError::TopLevelNonSafe)),
            (_, false) => Err(Error::from(CompilerError::ImpossibleNonMalleableCompilation)),
            _ => match desc_ctx {
                DescriptorCtx::Bare => Descriptor::new_bare(compiler::best_compilation(self)?),
                DescriptorCtx::Sh => Descriptor::new_sh(compiler::best_compilation(self)?),
                DescriptorCtx::Wsh => Descriptor::new_wsh(compiler::best_compilation(self)?),
                DescriptorCtx::ShWsh => Descriptor::new_sh_wsh(compiler::best_compilation(self)?),
                DescriptorCtx::Tr(unspendable_key) => self.compile_tr(unspendable_key),
            },
        }
    }

    /// Compiles the descriptor into an optimized `Miniscript` representation.
    ///
    /// # NOTE:
    ///
    /// It is **not recommended** to use policy as a stable identifier for a miniscript. You should
    /// use the policy compiler once, and then use the miniscript output as a stable identifier. See
    /// the compiler document in doc/compiler.md for more details.
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    pub fn compile<Ctx: ScriptContext>(&self) -> Result<Miniscript<Pk, Ctx>, CompilerError> {
        self.is_valid()?;
        match self.is_safe_nonmalleable() {
            (false, _) => Err(CompilerError::TopLevelNonSafe),
            (_, false) => Err(CompilerError::ImpossibleNonMalleableCompilation),
            _ => compiler::best_compilation(self),
        }
    }
}

#[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
impl<Pk: MiniscriptKey> Policy<Pk> {
    /// Returns a vector of policies whose disjunction is isomorphic to the initial one.
    ///
    /// This function is supposed to incrementally expand i.e. represent the policy as
    /// disjunction over sub-policies output by it. The probability calculations are similar
    /// to [`Policy::to_tapleaf_prob_vec`].
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    fn enumerate_pol(&self, prob: f64) -> Vec<(f64, Arc<Self>)> {
        match self {
            Policy::Or(subs) => {
                let total_odds = subs.iter().fold(0, |acc, x| acc + x.0);
                subs.iter()
                    .map(|(odds, pol)| (prob * *odds as f64 / total_odds as f64, pol.clone()))
                    .collect::<Vec<_>>()
            }
            Policy::Threshold(k, subs) if *k == 1 => {
                let total_odds = subs.len();
                subs.iter()
                    .map(|pol| (prob / total_odds as f64, pol.clone()))
                    .collect::<Vec<_>>()
            }
            Policy::Threshold(k, subs) if *k != subs.len() => generate_combination(subs, prob, *k),
            pol => vec![(prob, Arc::new(pol.clone()))],
        }
    }

    /// Generates a root-level disjunctive tree over the given policy tree.
    ///
    /// Uses a fixed-point algorithm to enumerate the disjunctions until exhaustive root-level
    /// enumeration or limits exceed. For a given [`Policy`], we maintain an [ordered
    /// set](`BTreeSet`) of `(prob, policy)` (ordered by probability) to maintain the list of
    /// enumerated sub-policies whose disjunction is isomorphic to initial policy (*invariant*).
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    fn enumerate_policy_tree(self, prob: f64) -> Vec<(f64, Arc<Self>)> {
        let mut tapleaf_prob_vec = BTreeSet::<(Reverse<OrdF64>, Arc<Self>)>::new();
        // Store probability corresponding to policy in the enumerated tree. This is required since
        // owing to the current [policy element enumeration algorithm][`Policy::enumerate_pol`],
        // two passes of the algorithm might result in same sub-policy showing up. Currently, we
        // merge the nodes by adding up the corresponding probabilities for the same policy.
        let mut pol_prob_map = BTreeMap::<Arc<Self>, OrdF64>::new();

        let arc_self = Arc::new(self);
        tapleaf_prob_vec.insert((Reverse(OrdF64(prob)), Arc::clone(&arc_self)));
        pol_prob_map.insert(Arc::clone(&arc_self), OrdF64(prob));

        // Since we know that policy enumeration *must* result in increase in total number of nodes,
        // we can maintain the length of the ordered set to check if the
        // [enumeration pass][`Policy::enumerate_pol`] results in further policy split or not.
        let mut prev_len = 0usize;
        // This is required since we merge some corresponding policy nodes, so we can explicitly
        // store the variables
        let mut enum_len = tapleaf_prob_vec.len();

        let mut ret: Vec<(f64, Arc<Self>)> = vec![];

        // Stopping condition: When NONE of the inputs can be further enumerated.
        'outer: loop {
            //--- FIND a plausible node ---
            let mut prob: Reverse<OrdF64> = Reverse(OrdF64(0.0));
            let mut curr_policy: Arc<Self> = Arc::new(Policy::Unsatisfiable);
            let mut curr_pol_replace_vec: Vec<(f64, Arc<Self>)> = vec![];
            let mut no_more_enum = false;

            // The nodes which can't be enumerated further are directly appended to ret and removed
            // from the ordered set.
            let mut to_del: Vec<(f64, Arc<Self>)> = vec![];
            'inner: for (i, (p, pol)) in tapleaf_prob_vec.iter().enumerate() {
                curr_pol_replace_vec = pol.enumerate_pol(p.0 .0);
                enum_len += curr_pol_replace_vec.len() - 1; // A disjunctive node should have seperated this into more nodes
                assert!(prev_len <= enum_len);

                if prev_len < enum_len {
                    // Plausible node found
                    prob = *p;
                    curr_policy = Arc::clone(pol);
                    break 'inner;
                } else if i == tapleaf_prob_vec.len() - 1 {
                    // No enumerable node found i.e. STOP
                    // Move all the elements to final return set
                    no_more_enum = true;
                } else {
                    // Either node is enumerable, or we have
                    // Mark all non-enumerable nodes to remove,
                    // if not returning value in the current iteration.
                    to_del.push((p.0 .0, Arc::clone(pol)));
                }
            }

            // --- Sanity Checks ---
            if enum_len > MAX_COMPILATION_LEAVES || no_more_enum {
                for (p, pol) in tapleaf_prob_vec.into_iter() {
                    ret.push((p.0 .0, pol));
                }
                break 'outer;
            }

            // If total number of nodes are in limits, we remove the current node and replace it
            // with children nodes

            // Remove current node
            assert!(tapleaf_prob_vec.remove(&(prob, curr_policy.clone())));

            // OPTIMIZATION - Move marked nodes into final vector
            for (p, pol) in to_del {
                assert!(tapleaf_prob_vec.remove(&(Reverse(OrdF64(p)), pol.clone())));
                ret.push((p, pol.clone()));
            }

            // Append node if not previously exists, else update the respective probability
            for (p, policy) in curr_pol_replace_vec {
                match pol_prob_map.get(&policy) {
                    Some(prev_prob) => {
                        assert!(tapleaf_prob_vec.remove(&(Reverse(*prev_prob), policy.clone())));
                        tapleaf_prob_vec.insert((Reverse(OrdF64(prev_prob.0 + p)), policy.clone()));
                        pol_prob_map.insert(policy.clone(), OrdF64(prev_prob.0 + p));
                    }
                    None => {
                        tapleaf_prob_vec.insert((Reverse(OrdF64(p)), policy.clone()));
                        pol_prob_map.insert(policy.clone(), OrdF64(p));
                    }
                }
            }
            // --- Update --- total sub-policies count (considering no merging of nodes)
            prev_len = enum_len;
        }

        ret
    }
}

impl<Pk: MiniscriptKey> ForEachKey<Pk> for Policy<Pk> {
    fn for_each_key<'a, F: FnMut(&'a Pk) -> bool>(&'a self, mut pred: F) -> bool {
        self.pre_order_iter().all(|policy| match policy {
            Policy::Key(ref pk) => pred(pk),
            _ => true,
        })
    }
}

impl<Pk: MiniscriptKey> Policy<Pk> {
    /// Converts a policy using one kind of public key to another type of public key.
    ///
    /// For example usage please see [`crate::policy::semantic::Policy::translate_pk`].
    pub fn translate_pk<Q, E, T>(&self, t: &mut T) -> Result<Policy<Q>, E>
    where
        T: Translator<Pk, Q, E>,
        Q: MiniscriptKey,
    {
        use Policy::*;

        let mut translated = vec![];
        for data in self.post_order_iter() {
            let child_n = |n| Arc::clone(&translated[data.child_indices[n]]);

            let new_policy = match data.node {
                Unsatisfiable => Unsatisfiable,
                Trivial => Trivial,
                Key(ref pk) => t.pk(pk).map(Key)?,
                Sha256(ref h) => t.sha256(h).map(Sha256)?,
                Hash256(ref h) => t.hash256(h).map(Hash256)?,
                Ripemd160(ref h) => t.ripemd160(h).map(Ripemd160)?,
                Hash160(ref h) => t.hash160(h).map(Hash160)?,
                Older(ref n) => Older(*n),
                After(ref n) => After(*n),
                And(ref subs) => And((0..subs.len()).map(child_n).collect()),
                Or(ref subs) => Or(subs
                    .iter()
                    .enumerate()
                    .map(|(i, (prob, _))| (*prob, child_n(i)))
                    .collect()),
                Threshold(ref k, ref subs) => Threshold(*k, (0..subs.len()).map(child_n).collect()),
            };
            translated.push(Arc::new(new_policy));
        }
        // Unwrap is ok because we know we processed at least one node.
        let root_node = translated.pop().unwrap();
        // Unwrap is ok because we know `root_node` is the only strong reference.
        Ok(Arc::try_unwrap(root_node).unwrap())
    }

    /// Translates `Concrete::Key(key)` to `Concrete::Unsatisfiable` when extracting `TapKey`.
    pub fn translate_unsatisfiable_pk(self, key: &Pk) -> Policy<Pk> {
        use Policy::*;

        let mut translated = vec![];
        for data in Arc::new(self).post_order_iter() {
            let child_n = |n| Arc::clone(&translated[data.child_indices[n]]);

            let new_policy = match data.node.as_ref() {
                Policy::Key(ref k) if k.clone() == *key => Some(Policy::Unsatisfiable),
                And(ref subs) => Some(And((0..subs.len()).map(child_n).collect())),
                Or(ref subs) => Some(Or(subs
                    .iter()
                    .enumerate()
                    .map(|(i, (prob, _))| (*prob, child_n(i)))
                    .collect())),
                Threshold(k, ref subs) => {
                    Some(Threshold(*k, (0..subs.len()).map(child_n).collect()))
                }
                _ => None,
            };
            match new_policy {
                Some(new_policy) => translated.push(Arc::new(new_policy)),
                None => translated.push(Arc::clone(&data.node)),
            }
        }
        // Ok to unwrap because we know we processed at least one node.
        let root_node = translated.pop().unwrap();
        // Ok to unwrap because we know `root_node` is the only strong reference.
        Arc::try_unwrap(root_node).unwrap()
    }

    /// Gets all keys in the policy.
    pub fn keys(&self) -> Vec<&Pk> {
        self.pre_order_iter()
            .filter_map(|policy| match policy {
                Policy::Key(ref pk) => Some(pk),
                _ => None,
            })
            .collect()
    }

    /// Gets the number of [TapLeaf](`TapTree::Leaf`)s considering exhaustive root-level [`Policy::Or`]
    /// and [`Policy::Threshold`] disjunctions for the `TapTree`.
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    fn num_tap_leaves(&self) -> usize {
        use Policy::*;

        let mut nums = vec![];
        for data in Arc::new(self).post_order_iter() {
            let num_for_child_n = |n| nums[data.child_indices[n]];

            let num = match data.node {
                Or(subs) => (0..subs.len()).map(num_for_child_n).sum(),
                Threshold(k, subs) if *k == 1 => (0..subs.len()).map(num_for_child_n).sum(),
                _ => 1,
            };
            nums.push(num);
        }
        // Ok to unwrap because we know we processed at least one node.
        nums.pop().unwrap()
    }

    /// Does checks on the number of `TapLeaf`s.
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    fn check_num_tapleaves(&self) -> Result<(), Error> {
        if self.num_tap_leaves() > MAX_COMPILATION_LEAVES {
            return Err(errstr("Too many Tapleaves"));
        }
        Ok(())
    }

    /// Checks whether the policy contains duplicate public keys.
    pub fn check_duplicate_keys(&self) -> Result<(), PolicyError> {
        let pks = self.keys();
        let pks_len = pks.len();
        let unique_pks_len = pks.into_iter().collect::<BTreeSet<_>>().len();

        if pks_len > unique_pks_len {
            Err(PolicyError::DuplicatePubKeys)
        } else {
            Ok(())
        }
    }

    /// Checks whether the given concrete policy contains a combination of
    /// timelocks and heightlocks.
    ///
    /// # Returns
    ///
    /// Returns an error if there is at least one satisfaction that contains
    /// a combination of heightlock and timelock.
    pub fn check_timelocks(&self) -> Result<(), PolicyError> {
        let aggregated_timelock_info = self.timelock_info();
        if aggregated_timelock_info.contains_combination {
            Err(PolicyError::HeightTimelockCombination)
        } else {
            Ok(())
        }
    }

    /// Processes `Policy` using `post_order_iter`, creates a `TimelockInfo` for each `Nullary` node
    /// and combines them together for `Nary` nodes.
    ///
    /// # Returns
    ///
    /// A single `TimelockInfo` that is the combination of all others after processing each node.
    fn timelock_info(&self) -> TimelockInfo {
        use Policy::*;

        let mut infos = vec![];
        for data in Arc::new(self).post_order_iter() {
            let info_for_child_n = |n| infos[data.child_indices[n]];

            let info = match data.node {
                Policy::After(ref t) => TimelockInfo {
                    csv_with_height: false,
                    csv_with_time: false,
                    cltv_with_height: absolute::LockTime::from(*t).is_block_height(),
                    cltv_with_time: absolute::LockTime::from(*t).is_block_time(),
                    contains_combination: false,
                },
                Policy::Older(ref t) => TimelockInfo {
                    csv_with_height: t.is_height_locked(),
                    csv_with_time: t.is_time_locked(),
                    cltv_with_height: false,
                    cltv_with_time: false,
                    contains_combination: false,
                },
                And(ref subs) => {
                    let iter = (0..subs.len()).map(info_for_child_n);
                    TimelockInfo::combine_threshold(subs.len(), iter)
                }
                Or(ref subs) => {
                    let iter = (0..subs.len()).map(info_for_child_n);
                    TimelockInfo::combine_threshold(1, iter)
                }
                Threshold(ref k, subs) => {
                    let iter = (0..subs.len()).map(info_for_child_n);
                    TimelockInfo::combine_threshold(*k, iter)
                }
                _ => TimelockInfo::default(),
            };
            infos.push(info);
        }
        // Ok to unwrap, we had to have visited at least one node.
        infos.pop().unwrap()
    }

    /// This returns whether the given policy is valid or not. It maybe possible that the policy
    /// contains Non-two argument `and`, `or` or a `0` arg thresh.
    /// Validity condition also checks whether there is a possible satisfaction
    /// combination of timelocks and heightlocks
    pub fn is_valid(&self) -> Result<(), PolicyError> {
        use Policy::*;

        self.check_timelocks()?;
        self.check_duplicate_keys()?;

        for policy in self.pre_order_iter() {
            match *policy {
                After(n) => {
                    if n == absolute::LockTime::ZERO.into() {
                        return Err(PolicyError::ZeroTime);
                    } else if n.to_u32() > 2u32.pow(31) {
                        return Err(PolicyError::TimeTooFar);
                    }
                }
                Older(n) => {
                    if n == Sequence::ZERO {
                        return Err(PolicyError::ZeroTime);
                    } else if n.to_consensus_u32() > 2u32.pow(31) {
                        return Err(PolicyError::TimeTooFar);
                    }
                }
                And(ref subs) => {
                    if subs.len() != 2 {
                        return Err(PolicyError::NonBinaryArgAnd);
                    }
                }
                Or(ref subs) => {
                    if subs.len() != 2 {
                        return Err(PolicyError::NonBinaryArgOr);
                    }
                }
                Threshold(k, ref subs) => {
                    if k == 0 || k > subs.len() {
                        return Err(PolicyError::IncorrectThresh);
                    }
                }
                _ => {}
            }
        }
        Ok(())
    }

    /// Checks if any possible compilation of the policy could be compiled
    /// as non-malleable and safe.
    ///
    /// # Returns
    ///
    /// Returns a tuple `(safe, non-malleable)` to avoid the fact that
    /// non-malleability depends on safety and we would like to cache results.
    pub fn is_safe_nonmalleable(&self) -> (bool, bool) {
        use Policy::*;

        let mut acc = vec![];
        for data in Arc::new(self).post_order_iter() {
            let acc_for_child_n = |n| acc[data.child_indices[n]];

            let new = match data.node {
                Unsatisfiable | Trivial | Key(_) => (true, true),
                Sha256(_) | Hash256(_) | Ripemd160(_) | Hash160(_) | After(_) | Older(_) => {
                    (false, true)
                }
                And(ref subs) => {
                    let (atleast_one_safe, all_non_mall) = (0..subs.len())
                        .map(acc_for_child_n)
                        .fold((false, true), |acc, x: (bool, bool)| (acc.0 || x.0, acc.1 && x.1));
                    (atleast_one_safe, all_non_mall)
                }
                Or(ref subs) => {
                    let (all_safe, atleast_one_safe, all_non_mall) = (0..subs.len())
                        .map(acc_for_child_n)
                        .fold((true, false, true), |acc, x| {
                            (acc.0 && x.0, acc.1 || x.0, acc.2 && x.1)
                        });
                    (all_safe, atleast_one_safe && all_non_mall)
                }
                Threshold(k, ref subs) => {
                    let (safe_count, non_mall_count) = (0..subs.len()).map(acc_for_child_n).fold(
                        (0, 0),
                        |(safe_count, non_mall_count), (safe, non_mall)| {
                            (safe_count + safe as usize, non_mall_count + non_mall as usize)
                        },
                    );
                    (
                        safe_count >= (subs.len() - k + 1),
                        non_mall_count == subs.len() && safe_count >= (subs.len() - k),
                    )
                }
            };
            acc.push(new);
        }
        // Ok to unwrap because we know we processed at least one node.
        acc.pop().unwrap()
    }
}

impl<Pk: MiniscriptKey> fmt::Debug for Policy<Pk> {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result {
        match *self {
            Policy::Unsatisfiable => f.write_str("UNSATISFIABLE()"),
            Policy::Trivial => f.write_str("TRIVIAL()"),
            Policy::Key(ref pk) => write!(f, "pk({:?})", pk),
            Policy::After(n) => write!(f, "after({})", n),
            Policy::Older(n) => write!(f, "older({})", n),
            Policy::Sha256(ref h) => write!(f, "sha256({})", h),
            Policy::Hash256(ref h) => write!(f, "hash256({})", h),
            Policy::Ripemd160(ref h) => write!(f, "ripemd160({})", h),
            Policy::Hash160(ref h) => write!(f, "hash160({})", h),
            Policy::And(ref subs) => {
                f.write_str("and(")?;
                if !subs.is_empty() {
                    write!(f, "{:?}", subs[0])?;
                    for sub in &subs[1..] {
                        write!(f, ",{:?}", sub)?;
                    }
                }
                f.write_str(")")
            }
            Policy::Or(ref subs) => {
                f.write_str("or(")?;
                if !subs.is_empty() {
                    write!(f, "{}@{:?}", subs[0].0, subs[0].1)?;
                    for sub in &subs[1..] {
                        write!(f, ",{}@{:?}", sub.0, sub.1)?;
                    }
                }
                f.write_str(")")
            }
            Policy::Threshold(k, ref subs) => {
                write!(f, "thresh({}", k)?;
                for sub in subs {
                    write!(f, ",{:?}", sub)?;
                }
                f.write_str(")")
            }
        }
    }
}

impl<Pk: MiniscriptKey> fmt::Display for Policy<Pk> {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result {
        match *self {
            Policy::Unsatisfiable => f.write_str("UNSATISFIABLE"),
            Policy::Trivial => f.write_str("TRIVIAL"),
            Policy::Key(ref pk) => write!(f, "pk({})", pk),
            Policy::After(n) => write!(f, "after({})", n),
            Policy::Older(n) => write!(f, "older({})", n),
            Policy::Sha256(ref h) => write!(f, "sha256({})", h),
            Policy::Hash256(ref h) => write!(f, "hash256({})", h),
            Policy::Ripemd160(ref h) => write!(f, "ripemd160({})", h),
            Policy::Hash160(ref h) => write!(f, "hash160({})", h),
            Policy::And(ref subs) => {
                f.write_str("and(")?;
                if !subs.is_empty() {
                    write!(f, "{}", subs[0])?;
                    for sub in &subs[1..] {
                        write!(f, ",{}", sub)?;
                    }
                }
                f.write_str(")")
            }
            Policy::Or(ref subs) => {
                f.write_str("or(")?;
                if !subs.is_empty() {
                    write!(f, "{}@{}", subs[0].0, subs[0].1)?;
                    for sub in &subs[1..] {
                        write!(f, ",{}@{}", sub.0, sub.1)?;
                    }
                }
                f.write_str(")")
            }
            Policy::Threshold(k, ref subs) => {
                write!(f, "thresh({}", k)?;
                for sub in subs {
                    write!(f, ",{}", sub)?;
                }
                f.write_str(")")
            }
        }
    }
}

impl_from_str!(
    Policy<Pk>,
    type Err = Error;,
    fn from_str(s: &str) -> Result<Policy<Pk>, Error> {
        expression::check_valid_chars(s)?;

        let tree = expression::Tree::from_str(s)?;
        let policy: Policy<Pk> = FromTree::from_tree(&tree)?;
        policy.check_timelocks()?;
        Ok(policy)
    }
);

serde_string_impl_pk!(Policy, "a miniscript concrete policy");

#[rustfmt::skip]
impl_block_str!(
    Policy<Pk>,
    /// Helper function for `from_tree` to parse subexpressions with
    /// names of the form x@y
    fn from_tree_prob(top: &expression::Tree, allow_prob: bool,)
        -> Result<(usize, Policy<Pk>), Error>
    {
        let frag_prob;
        let frag_name;
        let mut name_split = top.name.split('@');
        match (name_split.next(), name_split.next(), name_split.next()) {
            (None, _, _) => {
                frag_prob = 1;
                frag_name = "";
            }
            (Some(name), None, _) => {
                frag_prob = 1;
                frag_name = name;
            }
            (Some(prob), Some(name), None) => {
                if !allow_prob {
                    return Err(Error::AtOutsideOr(top.name.to_owned()));
                }
                frag_prob = expression::parse_num(prob)? as usize;
                frag_name = name;
            }
            (Some(_), Some(_), Some(_)) => {
                return Err(Error::MultiColon(top.name.to_owned()));
            }
        }
        match (frag_name, top.args.len() as u32) {
            ("UNSATISFIABLE", 0) => Ok(Policy::Unsatisfiable),
            ("TRIVIAL", 0) => Ok(Policy::Trivial),
            ("pk", 1) => expression::terminal(&top.args[0], |pk| Pk::from_str(pk).map(Policy::Key)),
            ("after", 1) => {
                let num = expression::terminal(&top.args[0], expression::parse_num)?;
                if num > 2u32.pow(31) {
                    return Err(Error::PolicyError(PolicyError::TimeTooFar));
                } else if num == 0 {
                    return Err(Error::PolicyError(PolicyError::ZeroTime));
                }
                Ok(Policy::after(num))
            }
            ("older", 1) => {
                let num = expression::terminal(&top.args[0], expression::parse_num)?;
                if num > 2u32.pow(31) {
                    return Err(Error::PolicyError(PolicyError::TimeTooFar));
                } else if num == 0 {
                    return Err(Error::PolicyError(PolicyError::ZeroTime));
                }
                Ok(Policy::older(num))
            }
            ("sha256", 1) => expression::terminal(&top.args[0], |x| {
                <Pk::Sha256 as core::str::FromStr>::from_str(x).map(Policy::Sha256)
            }),
            ("hash256", 1) => expression::terminal(&top.args[0], |x| {
                <Pk::Hash256 as core::str::FromStr>::from_str(x).map(Policy::Hash256)
            }),
            ("ripemd160", 1) => expression::terminal(&top.args[0], |x| {
                <Pk::Ripemd160 as core::str::FromStr>::from_str(x).map(Policy::Ripemd160)
            }),
            ("hash160", 1) => expression::terminal(&top.args[0], |x| {
                <Pk::Hash160 as core::str::FromStr>::from_str(x).map(Policy::Hash160)
            }),
            ("and", _) => {
                if top.args.len() != 2 {
                    return Err(Error::PolicyError(PolicyError::NonBinaryArgAnd));
                }
                let mut subs = Vec::with_capacity(top.args.len());
                for arg in &top.args {
                    subs.push(Arc::new(Policy::from_tree(arg)?));
                }
                Ok(Policy::And(subs))
            }
            ("or", _) => {
                if top.args.len() != 2 {
                    return Err(Error::PolicyError(PolicyError::NonBinaryArgOr));
                }
                let mut subs = Vec::with_capacity(top.args.len());
                for arg in &top.args {
                    subs.push(Policy::from_tree_prob(arg, true)?);
                }
                Ok(Policy::Or(subs.into_iter().map(|(prob, sub)| (prob, Arc::new(sub))).collect()))
            }
            ("thresh", nsubs) => {
                if top.args.is_empty() || !top.args[0].args.is_empty() {
                    return Err(Error::PolicyError(PolicyError::IncorrectThresh));
                }

                let thresh = expression::parse_num(top.args[0].name)?;
                if thresh >= nsubs || thresh == 0 {
                    return Err(Error::PolicyError(PolicyError::IncorrectThresh));
                }

                let mut subs = Vec::with_capacity(top.args.len() - 1);
                for arg in &top.args[1..] {
                    subs.push(Policy::from_tree(arg)?);
                }
                Ok(Policy::Threshold(thresh as usize, subs.into_iter().map(Arc::new).collect()))
            }
            _ => Err(errstr(top.name)),
        }
        .map(|res| (frag_prob, res))
    }
);

impl_from_tree!(
    Policy<Pk>,
    fn from_tree(top: &expression::Tree) -> Result<Policy<Pk>, Error> {
        Policy::from_tree_prob(top, false).map(|(_, result)| result)
    }
);

/// Creates a Huffman Tree from compiled [`Miniscript`] nodes.
#[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
fn with_huffman_tree<Pk: MiniscriptKey>(
    ms: Vec<(OrdF64, Miniscript<Pk, Tap>)>,
) -> Result<TapTree<Pk>, Error> {
    let mut node_weights = BinaryHeap::<(Reverse<OrdF64>, TapTree<Pk>)>::new();
    for (prob, script) in ms {
        node_weights.push((Reverse(prob), TapTree::Leaf(Arc::new(script))));
    }
    if node_weights.is_empty() {
        return Err(errstr("Empty Miniscript compilation"));
    }
    while node_weights.len() > 1 {
        let (p1, s1) = node_weights.pop().expect("len must atleast be two");
        let (p2, s2) = node_weights.pop().expect("len must atleast be two");

        let p = (p1.0).0 + (p2.0).0;
        node_weights.push((Reverse(OrdF64(p)), TapTree::combine(s1, s2)));
    }

    debug_assert!(node_weights.len() == 1);
    let node = node_weights
        .pop()
        .expect("huffman tree algorithm is broken")
        .1;
    Ok(node)
}

/// Enumerates a [`Policy::Threshold(k, ..n..)`] into `n` different thresh's.
///
/// ## Strategy
///
/// `thresh(k, x_1...x_n) := thresh(1, thresh(k, x_2...x_n), thresh(k, x_1x_3...x_n), ...., thresh(k, x_1...x_{n-1}))`
/// by the simple argument that choosing `k` conditions from `n` available conditions might not contain
/// any one of the conditions exclusively.
#[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
fn generate_combination<Pk: MiniscriptKey>(
    policy_vec: &Vec<Arc<Policy<Pk>>>,
    prob: f64,
    k: usize,
) -> Vec<(f64, Arc<Policy<Pk>>)> {
    debug_assert!(k <= policy_vec.len());

    let mut ret: Vec<(f64, Arc<Policy<Pk>>)> = vec![];
    for i in 0..policy_vec.len() {
        let policies: Vec<Arc<Policy<Pk>>> = policy_vec
            .iter()
            .enumerate()
            .filter_map(|(j, sub)| if j != i { Some(Arc::clone(sub)) } else { None })
            .collect();
        ret.push((prob / policy_vec.len() as f64, Arc::new(Policy::Threshold(k, policies))));
    }
    ret
}

#[cfg(all(test, feature = "compiler"))]
mod compiler_tests {
    use core::str::FromStr;

    use sync::Arc;

    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_gen_comb() {
        let policies: Vec<Arc<Concrete<String>>> = vec!["pk(A)", "pk(B)", "pk(C)", "pk(D)"]
            .into_iter()
            .map(|st| policy_str!("{}", st))
            .map(|p| Arc::new(p))
            .collect();

        let combinations = generate_combination(&policies, 1.0, 2);

        let comb_a: Vec<Policy<String>> = vec![
            policy_str!("pk(B)"),
            policy_str!("pk(C)"),
            policy_str!("pk(D)"),
        ];
        let comb_b: Vec<Policy<String>> = vec![
            policy_str!("pk(A)"),
            policy_str!("pk(C)"),
            policy_str!("pk(D)"),
        ];
        let comb_c: Vec<Policy<String>> = vec![
            policy_str!("pk(A)"),
            policy_str!("pk(B)"),
            policy_str!("pk(D)"),
        ];
        let comb_d: Vec<Policy<String>> = vec![
            policy_str!("pk(A)"),
            policy_str!("pk(B)"),
            policy_str!("pk(C)"),
        ];
        let expected_comb = vec![comb_a, comb_b, comb_c, comb_d]
            .into_iter()
            .map(|sub_pol| {
                (
                    0.25,
                    Arc::new(Policy::Threshold(
                        2,
                        sub_pol.into_iter().map(|p| Arc::new(p)).collect(),
                    )),
                )
            })
            .collect::<Vec<_>>();
        assert_eq!(combinations, expected_comb);
    }
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use std::str::FromStr;

    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn for_each_key_count_keys() {
        let liquid_pol = Policy::<String>::from_str(
            "or(and(older(4096),thresh(2,pk(A),pk(B),pk(C))),thresh(11,pk(F1),pk(F2),pk(F3),pk(F4),pk(F5),pk(F6),pk(F7),pk(F8),pk(F9),pk(F10),pk(F11),pk(F12),pk(F13),pk(F14)))").unwrap();
        let mut count = 0;
        assert!(liquid_pol.for_each_key(|_| {
            count += 1;
            true
        }));
        assert_eq!(count, 17);
    }

    #[test]
    fn for_each_key_fails_predicate() {
        let policy =
            Policy::<String>::from_str("or(and(pk(key0),pk(key1)),pk(oddnamedkey))").unwrap();
        assert!(!policy.for_each_key(|k| k.starts_with("key")));
    }

    #[test]
    fn tranaslate_pk() {
        pub struct TestTranslator;
        impl Translator<String, String, ()> for TestTranslator {
            fn pk(&mut self, pk: &String) -> Result<String, ()> {
                let new = format!("NEW-{}", pk);
                Ok(new.to_string())
            }
            fn sha256(&mut self, hash: &String) -> Result<String, ()> { Ok(hash.to_string()) }
            fn hash256(&mut self, hash: &String) -> Result<String, ()> { Ok(hash.to_string()) }
            fn ripemd160(&mut self, hash: &String) -> Result<String, ()> { Ok(hash.to_string()) }
            fn hash160(&mut self, hash: &String) -> Result<String, ()> { Ok(hash.to_string()) }
        }
        let policy = Policy::<String>::from_str("or(and(pk(A),pk(B)),pk(C))").unwrap();
        let mut t = TestTranslator;

        let want = Policy::<String>::from_str("or(and(pk(NEW-A),pk(NEW-B)),pk(NEW-C))").unwrap();
        let got = policy
            .translate_pk(&mut t)
            .expect("failed to translate keys");

        assert_eq!(got, want);
    }

    #[test]
    fn translate_unsatisfiable_pk() {
        let policy = Policy::<String>::from_str("or(and(pk(A),pk(B)),pk(C))").unwrap();

        let want = Policy::<String>::from_str("or(and(pk(A),UNSATISFIABLE),pk(C))").unwrap();
        let got = policy.translate_unsatisfiable_pk(&"B".to_string());

        assert_eq!(got, want);
    }

    #[test]
    fn keys() {
        let policy = Policy::<String>::from_str("or(and(pk(A),pk(B)),pk(C))").unwrap();

        let want = vec!["A", "B", "C"];
        let got = policy.keys();

        assert_eq!(got, want);
    }

    #[test]
    #[cfg(feature = "compiler")]
    fn num_tap_leaves() {
        let policy = Policy::<String>::from_str("or(and(pk(A),pk(B)),pk(C))").unwrap();
        assert_eq!(policy.num_tap_leaves(), 2);
    }

    #[test]
    #[should_panic]
    fn check_timelocks() {
        // This implicitly tests the check_timelocks API (has height and time locks).
        let _ = Policy::<String>::from_str("and(after(10),after(500000000))").unwrap();
    }
}